NYSASCSDHome  Board of Directors   Committees   Membership Directory   Newsletters  Officers   Upcoming Meetings    Legal Opinions     Staff

jJanuary 2008 Vol. XXII, No. 1     

Table of Contents
GOVERNOR DELIVERS STATE OF THE STATE
ASSOCIATION PROPOSES AMENDMENTS
CENTER FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING UPDATE
UPCOMING EVENTS

GOVERNOR DELIVERS
STATE OF
THE STATE

 

The Governor delivered the 2008 State of the State Message to a joint session of the Senate and Assembly. This message was the second such speech delivered by Mr. Spitzer and the first major speech since the tumultuous battle over his ill fated illegal alien license proposal. He received a warm reception from those in attendance, the vast majority of which were Democratic Assemblymen and Senators. Absent was Senate Majority Leader Bruno whose wife Barbara just passed away after a long battle with Alzheimer’s Disease.

He began with an ominous reference to the economic realties facing New Yorkers and the need to address them this year.

His plan for the year includes lowering taxes, growing the economy, improving education and controlling Medicaid costs. He touted the large investment in elementary-secondary education in 2007-08 and beyond, the Contract for Excellence (CFE is no longer a reference to a lawsuit) and Universal Pre-K as evidence of the extraordinary efforts already being made. He promised more accountability for districts and schools and intervention and takeovers of schools and districts which continue to fail.

He then promised that his education initiatives would be extended to higher education to make that system a world class system. The higher education system would then be an engine for growth in our communities and cities. 

He expressed the need for universal health care insurance coverage, coverage at affordable prices. Senator Schumer, who was in attendance, was applauded for his efforts, albeit unsuccessful because of Presidential opposition, in Washington to pass such legislation. The Executive Budget will include a proposal to extend coverage for every child in the state. Health care cost containment will be encouraged by emphasizing primary and preventative care. The doctor shortage will also be addressed to encourage doctors through a peace corps for physicians to serve under served areas in the inner cities and the North Country. The Type II diabetes epidemic will be addressed through proposals for getting junk food out of our schools.

He then spoke about economic revitalization, particularly in upstate New York. Property tax cuts/aid targeted last year to the middle class was a first step. He continued his promise of no new taxes and said that our excessively high local property taxes will be targeted again this year.

To accomplish this, unfunded mandates on school districts and municipalities will be examined along with a property tax cap by a commission to be led by Thomas Suozzi of Nassau County. A cap, he said, will enforce greater discipline while insuring that a quality education and efficient municipal services are provided.

He called for the Legislature to do for upstate now what they did for NYC in the historic 1970’s bailout. Already G.E., Welch-Allyn and Corning have committed to adding jobs in the state. He will propose a fund to be established in the amount of $1 billion to revitalize upstate.

 Governor Spitzer then concluded by paraphrasing Thomas Jefferson who said “We are all, Federalists, we are all, Republicans,” by saying we are all New Yorkers, upstate and downstate, urbanites and those in rural areas and should work together in a spirit of cooperation; a marked difference in tone and aggressiveness from the year before when he said that ‘everything would change on day one.’

 

 BACK TO TOP

ASSOCIATION PROPOSES AMENDMENTS

The Association board of directors has been working diligently the past several months to craft several proposals for consideration by the Governor and the Legislature. These proposals cover the Contract for Excellence, Charter Schools, the Debt Ceiling and the Center for School Improvement Planning. Each of these areas of concern has special significance for a large number of small city school districts and has been identified as priority issues in 2008. These proposals have been presented to the Governor and key members of the Legislature for consideration. We will continue to work toward introduction of the proposals or some version of them in the State Budget or Legislation in the current year. Any comments or suggestions are greatly welcomed. The bill language we have developed thus far for each issue is as follows:

 

1) CONTRACT FOR EXCELLENCE
    
2 a. (i) Each contract for excellence shall describe how the sum of the
     4  amounts apportioned to the school district in the current year as  total
     5  foundation  aid  and as supplemental educational improvement plan grants
     6  for the two thousand seven--two thousand eight school year and thereaft-
     7  er, in excess of one hundred three percent plus an additional  
per cent calculated as the product of three percent 
multiplied by the positive remainder of one and 3 tenths
 minus the district’s combined wealth ratio of the district's 
 foundation
     8  aid  base,  as adjusted for additional amounts payable as charter school
     9  basic tuition over such amount payable in the base year, shall  be  used
    10  to support new programs and new activities or expand the use of programs
    11  and activities demonstrated to improve student achievement.
              (ii) For the purpose of this section new programs 
and new activities shall include those programs and 
activities established not earlier than two years prior to 
the base year which have been mandated by the department 
or which have been commenced expressly to improve student 
performance.
    12    b.  (i)  The  contract  shall specify the new or expanded programs for
    13  which additional amounts of such total foundation aid, or grant shall be
    14  used and shall affirm that such  programs  shall  first benefit 
those areas of student and school performance that resulted
 in the school or schools being identified as requiring 
academic progressor in need of improvement  or  in  
corrective  action  or  restructuring status, and only to 
the extent needed to restore that school or schools to non-
identified status; and , next, provided that the district
 graduation rate after five years is below 65%, the contract
 shall affirm that such programs shall  
predominately  benefit
    15  students  with the greatest educational needs including, but not limited
    16  to, those students with limited English proficiency, students in poverty
    17  and students with disabilities; and for all other districts,  
the contract shall affirm that such programs shall benefit 
students as in the discretion of the district may be in 
greatest need, provided however, that for districts with
tax rates in excess of 120% of the assumed tax rate provided
under the foundation aid formula, the contract may provide
for local tax relief.
    18    
    38    3. a. The commissioner shall adopt regulations establishing  allowable
    39  programs  and  activities  intended to improve student achievement which
    40  shall include and be given priority in funding but not 
be limited to class size reduction, programs that increase student
    41  time on task, teacher and principal quality initiatives,  middle  school
    42  and  high school re-structuring, and full-day kindergarten or prekinder-
    43  garten. Provided, however, that districts may use up to fifteen  percent
    44  of  the  total additional funding above the foundation aid base 
they  receive  for  experimental  programs
    45  designed to demonstrate the efficacy  of  other  strategies  to  improve
    46  student  achievement  consistent with the intent of this section and, in
    47  school year two thousand seven--two thousand eight and thereafter, up 
to thirty million
    48  dollars or twenty-five percent of such total additional funding above
 the foundation aid base, whichever  is
    49  less,  may  be  used  to maintain investments in programs and activities
    50  listed in this subdivision.  Any such district seeking to  implement  an
    51  experimental  program  shall  first  submit  a  plan to the commissioner
    52  setting forth the need  for  such  experimental  program  and  how  such
    53  program will improve student performance.
    54    b.    The  commissioner  shall assist school districts that include in
    55  their contract for excellence the implementation of  incentives,  devel-
    56  oped  in  collaboration with teachers in the collective bargaining proc-
        S. 2107--C                         14                         A. 4307--C
 
     1  ess, for highly qualified  and  experienced  teachers  to  work  in  low
     2  performing schools to ensure that such incentives are effective.
     
    28    6. The school district audit report certified to the  commissioner  by
    29  an independent certified public accountant, an independent accountant or
    30  the  comptroller  of the city of New York pursuant to section twenty-one
    31  hundred sixteen-a of this chapter shall include a certification by  such
    32  accountant  or  comptroller in a form prescribed by the commissioner and
    33  that the increases in total foundation aid and supplemental  educational
    34  improvement  plan  grants have been used to supplement, and not supplant
    35  funds allocated by the district in the base year for such purposes. Use 
of aid and grants in accordance with the contract shall be 
prima facie evidence that the requirement of this sub-
paragraph has been satisfied.

    36   

 

2) CHARTER SCHOOLS 
 
 § 18. Section 3602 of the education law is amended  by  adding  a  new
    45  subdivision 41 to read as follows:
    46    41.  Transitional  aid for charter school payments. In addition to any
    47  other apportionment under this section, for the two thousand  eight--two
    48  thousand  nine  school  year and thereafter, a school district shall be
    49  eligible for an apportionment in an amount equal to the sum of
 
50    (a) the product of (i) the product of eighty percent multiplied by the
    51  charter school basic tuition computed for such school district  for  the
    52  base  year  pursuant  to  section twenty-eight hundred fifty-six of this
    53  chapter, multiplied by (ii) the positive  difference,  if  any,  of  the
    54  number  of  resident  pupils  enrolled in the charter school in the base
    55  year less the number of resident pupils enrolled in a charter school  in
    56  the  third year  prior  to  the  base  year,  provided, however, that a
 school
 
        S. 2107--C                         64                         A. 4307--C
 
     1  district shall be eligible for an apportionment pursuant to  this  para-
     2  graph  only  if  the  number  of its resident pupils enrolled in charter
     3  schools in the base year exceeds  two  percent  of  the  total  resident
     4  public  school  district  enrollment of such school district in the base
     5  year or the total general fund payments made by such district to charter
     6  schools in the base year for resident pupils enrolled in charter schools
     7  exceeds two percent of total general fund expenditures of such  district
     8  in the base year, plus
     9    (b)  the product of (i) the product of sixty percent multiplied by the 
    10  charter school basic tuition computed for such school district  for  
    11  base  year  pursuant  to  section twenty-eight hundred fifty-six of this
    12  chapter, multiplied by (ii) the positive  difference,  if  any,  of  the
    13  number  of  resident  pupils  enrolled in the charter school in the 
fourth year
    14  prior to the base year less the number of resident pupils enrolled in  a
    15  charter  school  in the year two years prior to the base year, provided,
    16  however, that a school district shall be eligible for  an  apportionment
    17  pursuant  to  this  paragraph  only if the number of its resident pupils
    18  enrolled in charter schools in the year prior to the base  year  exceeds
    19  two  percent  of the total resident public school district enrollment of
    20  such school district in the year prior to the base  year  or  the  total
    21  general  fund  payments  made by such district to charter schools in the
    22  year prior to the base year for  resident  pupils  enrolled  in  charter
    23  schools  exceeds  two  percent of the total general fund expenditures of
    24  such district in the year prior to the base year, plus
    25    (c) the product of (i) the product of forty percent multiplied by  the
    26  charter  school  basic tuition computed for such school district for the
    27  base year pursuant to section twenty-eight  hundred  fifty-six  of  this
    28  chapter,  multiplied  by  (ii)  the  positive difference, if any, of the
    29  number of resident pupils enrolled in the charter school in the year fifth
    30  year[s] prior to the base year less the number of resident pupils enrolled
    31  in a charter school in the year three years  prior  to  the  base  year,
    32  provided,  however,  that  a  school  district  shall be eligible for an
    33  apportionment pursuant to this paragraph only if the number of its resi-
    34  dent pupils enrolled in charter schools in the year two years  prior  to
    35  the  base  year  exceeds two percent of the total resident public school
    36  district enrollment of such school district in the year two years  prior
    37  to  the  base  year  or  the  total  general  fund payments made by such
    38  district to charter schools in the year two years prior to the base year
    39  for resident pupils enrolled in charter schools exceeds two  percent  of
    40  the  total  general  fund  expenditures of such district in the year two
    41  years prior to the base year, plus 
    50    (d) the product of forty percent multiplied by the
    51  charter school basic tuition computed for such school 
district  for  the
    52  base  year  pursuant  to  section twenty-eight
 hundred fifty-six of this
    53  chapter, multiplied by the
    54  number  of  resident  pupils  enrolled in the charter 
school in the base year.
    55  
    42    (e) For purposes of this subdivision the number of pupils enrolled  in
    43  a  charter  school shall not include pupils enrolled in a charter school
    44  for which the charter was approved by  a  charter  entity  contained  in
    45  paragraph  a of subdivision three of section twenty-eight hundred fifty-
    46  one of this chapter.

 

 

3) DEBT CEILING 
 
PROPOSED Legislation for Small City School Districts 12/21/07- REB
     
 
 AN ACT to amend the local finance law, in relation to the  exclusion  of
          certain indebtedness of certain city school districts
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Section 121.20 of the local  finance  law,  as  amended  by
     2  chapter  506  of the laws of 1964, paragraph b as amended by chapter 116
     3  of the laws of 1968, is amended to read as follows:
     4    § 121.20[.] Exclusion of  certain  indebtedness  of  school  districts
     5  other than school districts in a city with one hundred twenty-five thou-
     6  sand  inhabitants  or  more  according  to  the latest federal census in
     7  ascertaining their power to contract indebtedness.  a. As used  in  this
     8  section:
     9    1.  The term "indebtedness" shall mean indebtedness evidenced by bonds
    10  and bond anticipation notes.
    11    2. The term "school district" shall mean a school district other  than
    12  a school district in a city with one hundred twenty-five thousand inhab-
    13  itants or more according to the latest federal census.
    
     8    §  2. Section 121.30 of the local finance law, as added by chapter 382
     9  of the laws of 1962, is amended to read as follows:
    10    § 121.30 Exclusion of certain indebtedness of school  districts  other
    11  than  school  districts  in a city with one hundred twenty-five thousand
    12  inhabitants or more according to the latest federal  census.  In  ascer-
    13  taining  the power of a school district, other than a school district in
    14  a city with one hundred twenty-five thousand inhabitants or more accord-
    15  ing to the latest federal census, to contract indebtedness under section
    16  104.00 of this chapter, there may be excluded outstanding bonds and bond
    17  anticipation notes or indebtedness proposed to be contracted and  to  be
    18  evidenced  by  bonds  or bond anticipation notes to finance the acquisi-
    19  tion, construction and installation of a shelter or fallout  shelter  by
    20  such  school district pursuant to section twenty-three-a of the New York
    21  state defense emergency act, but  only  to  the  extent  to  which  such
    22  indebtedness,  at the time it was contracted or is to be contracted, did
    23  not or will not exceed fifty dollars multiplied by the  planned  shelter
    24  occupancy of such shelter.
    25    §  3.  Section  137.00 of the local finance law, as amended by chapter
    26  760 of the laws of 1963, is amended to read as follows:
    27    § 137.00 Debt statement of school districts outside cities   with  one
    28  hundred twenty-five thousand inhabitants or more according to the latest
    29  federal  census.  The  debt statement of a school district, other than a
    30  school district in a city with one hundred twenty-five thousand inhabit-
    31  ants or more according to the latest federal census, shall  contain  the
    32  following  items  of indebtedness for the purpose of showing the indebt-
    33  edness of such school district:
    34    1. The amount of
    35    (a) Outstanding bonds;
    36    (b) Outstanding bond anticipation notes, other than  those  issued  in
    37  anticipation of the bonds of the issue in connection with which the debt
    38  statement is prepared;
    39    (c)  Bonds  of  the  proposed  issue in connection with which the debt
    40  statement is prepared; and
    41    (d) Bond anticipation notes proposed to be issued where a debt  state-
    42  ment is prepared in connection with the issuance of such notes.
    43    2.  The  amount of indebtedness of a merged or annexed school district
    44  determined pursuant to section 121.10 of this chapter.
    45    For the purpose of showing the  indebtedness  of  a  school  district,
    46  other  than  a  school  district  in a city with one hundred twenty-five
    47  thousand inhabitants or more according to  the  latest  federal  census,
    48  there may be deducted the amount of any such indebtedness which has been
    49  contracted  or  is  proposed  to be contracted to the extent provided in
    50  section 121.20 of this chapter, and in such case a certified copy of the
    51  estimate of the commissioner of education shall be attached to and  form
    52  a  part  of  the debt statement filed with the state comptroller and the
    53  clerk of the school district.
    54    For the purpose of showing the indebtedness of a school district other
    55  than a school district in a city with one hundred  twenty-five  thousand
    56  inhabitants or more according to the latest federal census, there may be
        S. 2504                             3
 
     1  deducted the amount of indebtedness contracted, or indebtedness proposed
     2  to  be contracted, for the purpose and to the extent provided in section
     3  121.30 of this chapter.
     4    In  connection  with  the  sale  of  bond anticipation notes, a school
     5  district may prepare a debt statement and may file such statement in the
     6  manner provided in section 109.00 of this chapter.
     7    § 4. This act shall take effect immediately.

 

4) CENTER FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING                      
 
        STATE OPERATIONS AND AID TO LOCALITIES   2007-08
 
     
    12  For services and expenses of  the  New  York
    13    State Historical Association ................... 180,000
    14  For  services  and  expenses  related to the center for school   
 improvement planning for small city school districts                   
                          .......................... 150,000   
For  services  and  expenses  of  the  rural
    15    education advisory council ..................... 175,000
    16  For services and  expenses  for  a  $600,000
    17    grant for Tech Valley High School .............. 600,000

 

  BACK TO TOP

CENTER FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING
UPDATE

 

The Association’s Center for School Improvement Planning has been forging ahead in its work with the three pilot districts, Jamestown, Binghamton and Fulton. As we write, the efforts with Fulton are just being completed this week with Lonnie Palmer having visited the Fulton administration to review the district report and examine the report’s implications for district programs and strategies. Feedback from all three districts has been encouraging. Each district has expressed the opinion that the Center’s report and staff guidance have been highly effective in discretely targeting the areas of district strength and weakness and thereby enabling implementation of corrective measures without wasting scarce resources. It is the Center’s intention to begin making its services available on a wider basis; not just to C4E districts and not just to small city districts. The Center’s bench mark report can be especially useful for districts experiencing superintendent or business official turn-over, in aid of the search process or as a guide for the newly hired superintendent or business official. Please contact the Association if you have interest.

The Center is also embarked on a joint endeavor to obtain federal grants to fund its work. The Center is working with ACT,Inc.,  the Business Council, Inc. and the SUNY Board of Trustees (potentially) to apply for GEAR UP funds to make the testing programs provided by ACT available  in grades 8-9 and 10. To date 14 small city districts have been selected to participate in the application and an organizational meeting is scheduled for February 8, 2008. The ACT testing programs have already been used by numerous small city districts with significant success. They are being used to reduce drop out rates and to enhance career and college readiness.

 

  BACK TO TOP

UPCOMING
EVENTS

January 12, 2008 CANCELLED
9:30AM to 4:00PM
Joint Association Seminar- NYSASCSD, NYSCOSS and NYSSBA
“Learning Solutions Forum”

January 13, 2008 OPEN TO ALL MEMBERS
1:00pm – 3:30pm
Board of Directors meeting in conjunction with NYSCOSS midwinter meeting
Desmond Hotel, Albany, NY

February 8, 2008
10:30AM
Center for School Improvement organizational meeting for GEAR UP grant
Fort Orange Club, Albany, NY

March 11, 2008
8am – 12pm
Legislative Breakfast
Fort Orange Club, Albany, NY

 June 1-2, 2008
Annual Conference
The Otesaga, Cooperstown, NY

 BACK TO TOP

Albany
Amsterdam
Auburn
•Batavia
Beacon
•Binghamton
•Canandaigua
Cohoes
Corning
Cortland
Dunkirk
Elmira
Fulton
Geneva
•Glen Cove
•Glens Falls
Gloversville
Hornell
Hudson
Ithaca
Jamestown
Johnstown
Kingston
Lackawanna
Little Falls
Lockport
Long Beach
Mechanicville
Middletown
Mount Vernon
New Rochelle
Newburgh
Niagara Falls
N. Tonawanda
Norwich
Ogdensburg
Olean
Oneida
•Oneonta
Oswego
Peekskill
Plattsburgh
Port Jervis
Poughkeepsie
Rensselaer
Rome 
Rye
Salamanca
Saratoga
Schenectady
Tonawanda
Troy
Utica
Vernon Verona Sherrill
•Watertown
Watervliet
White Plains